A Site Dedicated to Fabric-Formed Concrete

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:appendix_a [2023/10/02 14:49] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:appendix_a [2023/10/19 15:20] (current) – [References] rpschmitz
Line 1: Line 1:
-**<fs large>[[fabwiki:research:canada:delijani|BACK TO MAIN TOC]]</fs>**+**<fs large>[[fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani|BACK TO MAIN TOC]]</fs>**
  
 ====== Appendix A: Cost Analysis ======  ====== Appendix A: Cost Analysis ====== 
  
-<align justify><fs medium>Use of fabric formwork for concrete columns, would result in savings for project owners, builders and contractors. Since in this study comparison was made between cardboard and fabric formwork, a cost evaluation was adapted from the industry to show the amount of savings when the two techniques are being employed [1]. This case study reviews cost analysis of column forms for a project in Aldergrove, BC. As seen in Table A1 and A2, the analysis compares the overall cost of a non-permeable commercially available column fabric formwork called Fast-Tube™ (Figure A1) to conventional cardboard formworks and Geotex 315ST used in this thesis. As seen in Table A2, comparing to cardboard formwork, cost analysis shows 72.2% reduction in cost for Fast-Tube™ and 89.8% for Geotex 315ST.</fs></align>+### 
 +<fs medium>Use of fabric formwork for concrete columns, would result in savings for project owners, builders and contractors. Since in this study comparison was made between cardboard and fabric formwork, a cost evaluation was adapted from the industry to show the amount of savings when the two techniques are being employed [1]. This case study reviews cost analysis of column forms for a project in Aldergrove, BC. As seen in Table A1 and A2, the analysis compares the overall cost of a non-permeable commercially available column fabric formwork called Fast-Tube™ (Figure A1) to conventional cardboard formworks and Geotex 315ST used in this thesis. As seen in Table A2, comparing to cardboard formwork, cost analysis shows 72.2% reduction in cost for Fast-Tube™ and 89.8% for Geotex 315ST.</fs> 
 +###
  
-{{:fabwiki:research:canada:delijani:delijani_table_a1.jpg?300x150|Table A1: Project detail used for cost analysis}}{{:fabwiki:research:canada:delijani:delijani_table_a2.jpg?500x300|Table A2: Project detail used for cost analysis}}{{:fabwiki:research:canada:delijani:delijani_table_a3.jpg?600x175|Table A3: General assumptions used for cost analysis of the project}} 
  
-{{gallery> fabwiki:research:canada:delijani:fig_a1?200x300&3&showtitle&lightbox }}+{{:fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:delijani_table_a1.jpg?300x150|Table A1: Project detail used for cost analysis}}{{:fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:delijani_table_a2.jpg?500x300|Table A2: Project detail used for cost analysis}}{{:fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:delijani_table_a3.jpg?600x175|Table A3: General assumptions used for cost analysis of the project}} 
 + 
 +{{gallery> fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:fig_a1?200x300&3&showtitle&lightbox }}
 ===== See Also ===== ===== See Also =====
  
 <fs medium>//Place text here.//</fs> <fs medium>//Place text here.//</fs>
 +
 ~~UP~~ ~~UP~~
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====
  
-<fs medium>[1] //Fab-Form Industries Ltd.// 2009. http://fab-form.com/ (accessed August 11, 2009).\\  +<fs medium>[1] //Fab-Form Industries Ltd.// 2009. http://fab-form.com/ (accessed August 11, 2009).\\ </fs> 
-</fs>+
 ~~UP~~ ~~UP~~
QR Code
QR Code fabformwiki:research:canada:delijani:appendix_a (generated for current page)